Don't eat it! Propylene glycol exceeds the standard, and excessive consumption of Gangrong steamed cake for a long time hurts the kidneys...

Gangrong steamed cake propylene glycol exceeded the standard and was on the black list

"Gangrong Steamed Cake" produced by Jieyang Gangrong Food Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Gangrong Food") quickly gained popularity by sponsoring video programs such as "The Voice of China" and "If You Are the One".

Gangrong steamed cake propylene glycol exceeded the standard and was on the black list

This meal replacement product that many "healthy people" like has recently been exposed to major food safety issues again.

Gangrong steamed cake propylene glycol exceeds the standard

On July 26, the Guangdong Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Bureau released a report on 10 batches of unqualified food, and Gangrong Steamed Cake Propylene Glycol exceeded the standard and was on the black list. According to the random inspection results, the Matcha Steamed Cake sold by Meilun Supermarket in Xiangqiao District, Chaozhou City, and labeled as produced by Jieyang Gangrong Food Development Co., Ltd., the detection value of propylene glycol was 3.55g/kg, and the national standard stipulated that it was ≤ 3.0g/kg. According to this standard, the detection value of propylene glycol in unqualified cakes in this random inspection exceeded the standard by up to 69%.

Product name Matcha steamed cake
Manufacturer Jieyang Gangrong Food Development Co., Ltd.
Non-conforming items Propylene glycol
Checkout value 3.55g/kg
Standard value ≤ 3.0g/kg
Excess ratio 69%

Gangrong Food Response

Regarding the quality inspection finding that "propylene glycol exceeded the standard", ifeng.com Finance called Gangrong Food, and the other party said that the problem batch of products may be caused by transportation, weather or other problems. At present, the review has been strengthened in relevant fields, and each batch of products produced will be sent for quality inspection. At the same time, the other party emphasized that this is only an individual case.

Hazards of propylene glycol

According to the Guangdong Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Bureau, in the food industry, propylene glycol is an excellent solvent, which can dissolve food additives such as preservatives, pigments, and antioxidants that are insoluble in water, and then add food; propylene glycol has strong hygroscopicity and has moisturizing and antifreeze effects on food.

However, long-term excessive consumption of propylene glycol also has great side effects. According to the Guangdong Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Bureau, propylene glycol is a low-toxicity category, and long-term excessive consumption may cause kidney disorders. The reason for the unqualified propylene glycol project in cakes may be that the manufacturer did not use it in excess during production and processing according to the national standard.

Repeated exposure to food safety issues

In fact, the unqualified items of Gangrong steamed cake were far more than propylene glycol. In recent years, Gangrong Food has been exposed to product quality problems many times.

Hubei Gangrong Food Problem

In 2019, on May 9, 2019, the 17th issue of food safety supervision and sampling information announcement released by the official website of Hubei Provincial Market Supervision Bureau showed that the labeled matcha steamed cake produced by Hubei Gangrong Food Co., Ltd. had a detection value of 4.81g/kg of propylene glycol, and the standard was ≤ 3.0g/kg.

Xiaogan food and Drug Administration flight inspection warning letter

In May 2018, the official website of Xiaogan City Food and Drug Administration issued a warning letter for the flight inspection of Hubei Gangrong Food Co., Ltd. (No. 8, 2018). According to the Xiaogan City Food and Drug Administration, the flight inspection was carried out on 7 aspects of Gangrong Food's enterprise qualification, production site and equipment facilities, procurement and purchase inspection management, and production process control. Now, the problems found in your company's procurement and purchase inspection management, production process control, documents and records, and food safety accident handling during this flight inspection are as follows:

  • Incomplete identification information of items in the warehouse for purchase and purchase inspection management. Does not meet the requirements of Article 7.2.6 GB14881 on the management of food raw materials.
  • Production process control. The key control requirements are not in place, and the production and feeding records of key links are incomplete, which does not meet the requirements of Article 46 of the Food Safety Law that food production enterprises should formulate and implement controls on key production links such as production processes, equipment, storage, and packaging.
  • Incomplete regular maintenance records of production equipment and facilities. Does not comply with the provisions of GB14881 5.2.3 on the maintenance and repair of equipment. A system of equipment maintenance and repair shall be established, and the daily maintenance and maintenance of equipment shall be strengthened. Regular maintenance and timely records shall be recorded.
  • Documentation and recording of air cleanliness self-test report The conclusion is inconsistent with the inspection item. Does not meet the provisions of 14.1.1.2 in GB14881 that the processing process of food (including process parameters, environmental monitoring, etc.), product storage and product inspection batch number, inspection date, inspection personnel, inspection methods, inspection results, etc. should be truthfully recorded.
  • Disposal of food safety accidents There is no record of regular drills of food safety emergency plans and implementation of food safety precautions. It does not comply with Article 102 of the Food Safety Law that food production and operation enterprises shall formulate food safety accident disposal plans, regularly check the implementation of various food safety precautions in their enterprises, and eliminate hidden dangers of accidents in a timely manner.

Staphylococcus aureus project failed

On September 7, 2017, the Market Supervision Administration of Xiaogan City, Hubei Province (formerly the Food and Drug Administration of Xiaogan City) released the sampling information of the 9th issue of food safety supervision in 2017, showing that the Gangrong Steamed Coconut Cake Staphylococcus aureus project produced by Hubei Gangrong Food Co., Ltd. failed the sampling inspection.

The total number of colonies of Gangrong steamed milk cake failed

On May 12, 2017, the official website of the Guangzhou Municipal Market Supervision Administration (formerly Guangzhou Food and Drug Administration) announced the 2017 Quarter 1 food supervision and sampling information, showing that the total number of colonies of Gangrong steamed milk cake produced by Jieyang Gangrong Food Development Co., Ltd. failed.

Hong Kong Rong steamed cakes do not pay enough attention to new media publicity

Compared with the high-profile TV promotion, Gangrong Steamed Cake's attention to new media promotion is obviously not enough. After ifeng.com Finance opened the Sina Weibo search, it found that the company did not have an officially certified Weibo account, only one called "Gangrong Steamed Cake" with a background covered with steamed cake products. The latest Weibo stayed in 2015, and the only comments in the comment area were abuse from netizens who heard the news today. The search found that other social media channels did not have Gangrong's direct response to the matter.

Does Gangrong Steamed Cake not cherish its own brand?

With enough funds to appear on the screen and blow up the brand, why can't even the most basic and important food safety issues be solved? The repeated public criticism of the regulatory authorities and the overwhelming crusade of netizens are not afraid at all. Without coming forward to explain the reason, does Hong Kong Rong Steamed Cake not cherish its own brand?

Will anyone be willing to pay for a brand that ignores public expectations and ignores consumers' health? Do you still dare to eat it?

Source: Phoenix Finance (some content from Consumer Reports, Tianyancha), Daily Economic News (comprehensive Beijing time, "Corporate Transparency Report")